Case Study
MICHR Website: Information Architecture, Search, and Governance
Redesigning navigation and search so researchers reach the right offering in fewer clicks—paired with content governance and leader-friendly analytics.
Context & Problem
MICHR supports researchers with offerings across training, engagement, and study support. Analytics + feedback showed users landing on news/events instead of offerings, and key tasks buried under broad categories.
We needed a task-first IA, clearer labels, and search that prefers offerings over announcements.
Goals
- Help researchers reach the right offering in ≤ 2–3 clicks.
- Reduce confusion between Offerings vs. News/Events.
- Stand up governance (owners, cadence, intake).
- Ship a GA4/GSC dashboard leaders can skim monthly.
Approach
Research
- Open/closed card sorts for category language.
- Tree tests on top tasks (e.g., “Request study support”).
- Usability tests on navigation labels & CTAs.
- Stakeholder workshops to align terminology.
Data & Content
- GA4 paths + GSC queries to find dead ends/missed intent.
- Content audit → merge duplicates, task-first intros.
- Governance model: owners, review cadence, intake form.
- Performance dashboard: traffic, queries, conversions.
Key Decisions
- Task-first nav: Offerings up front; News/Events secondary.
- Labels: From generic “Resources” → verb-first + audience paths.
- Search: Boost offering pages; add synonyms/redirects for top queries.
- Governance: Simple intake + owners + quarterly content review.
Outcomes
- Faster time-to-task on top 5 offerings.
- Search results now land on offerings vs. announcements.
- Leaders review site health monthly without new tools.
Note: Swap in your numbers once ready (e.g., +18% task completion, −27% exits on offering pages).
Artifacts
What I’d Do Next
- Iterate synonyms/redirects as queries evolve.
- Extend governance to microsites; standardize intake templates.
- Add click-map tracking on top offering pages.